Banijay, All3 and the New Wave of Consolidation: How TV Production Mergers Will Change What You Stream
Entertainment BusinessTV IndustryGlobal Media

Banijay, All3 and the New Wave of Consolidation: How TV Production Mergers Will Change What You Stream

nnewsdesk24
2026-01-25 12:00:00
9 min read
Advertisement

Banijay and All3's talks kick off a 2026 consolidation wave. Here’s how format licensing, MasterChef-style remakes and streaming catalogs will shift.

Why you should care: streaming chaos, subscription fatigue and shrinking choice

If you ever felt overwhelmed by which platform holds which show, you are not alone. The early months of 2026 brought a new wave of consolidation in the TV production world — most notably talks between Banijay and All3 — that will directly affect what arrives in your streaming catalogs, how local versions of hits are made, and how easily formats like MasterChef or The Traitors travel across borders. This matters because consolidation changes bargaining power, licensing windows and the very economics that determine whether a series is available in your country or gets made at all.

Quick take: the bottom line up front

Industry consolidation — illustrated by late 2025 and early 2026 talks between Banijay and All3 — is accelerating a shift toward fewer, larger production groups that combine vast libraries, format IP and distribution muscle. For viewers that means:

  • More platform-specific exclusives and regional holdouts in streaming catalogs.
  • Faster global rollouts for big-format hits, but fewer small, niche titles finding homes.
  • Tighter format licensing deals: simplified licensing for buyers, but higher prices and more restrictive terms for smaller broadcasters and local producers.
  • Greater standardization of localized versions of hits — predictable quality, but less creative risk.

What’s happening now: Banijay, All3 and the 2026 consolidation cycle

In early 2026, industry watchers noted public confirmation that Banijay and the parent of All3Media were in deep discussions over merging production assets. This follows Banijay's earlier growth through acquisitions such as Zodiak and Endemol Shine, and All3's steady aggregation of specialist labels and high-performance reality and unscripted producers.

The significance goes beyond two companies shaking hands. It reflects several concurrent market drivers that gained momentum in late 2025 and into 2026:

  • Streaming revenue growth slowing in established markets, pushing platforms to protect margins through exclusive content partnerships.
  • Rising costs for premium scripted and high-end unscripted production, encouraging scale to spread overheads.
  • Platform buyers demanding global-ready formats to reduce the risk of regional flops.
  • Investors favoring consolidation to create portfolio value and predictable licensing cashflows.

Why Banijay + All3 is emblematic, not unique

Banijay’s prior integrations show how scale can turn a single deal into an ecosystem. When you combine catalogs and distribution teams, you lower per-title marketing costs, create cross-selling opportunities, and wield more leverage with global streamers. All3 brings its own strengths in formats and producer-led labels. The result is a production powerhouse that can both license and withhold shows strategically.

How consolidation will change what you stream

There are three practical channels where viewers will notice the effect: availability, discovery and the nature of local remakes.

1. Availability: more exclusives, regional blackouts, and delayed windows

Consolidated producers can choose to bundle rights to push shows onto preferred platforms. That can mean:

  • Platform exclusives: Popular formats may be licensed as global exclusives to a single streamer, tightening choice across competing services. See recent landmark platform deals for how exclusive rights are negotiated and what that implies for global availability (BBC x YouTube is a useful comparator for platform-level bargaining).
  • Territorial holds: Large groups can prioritize deals market-by-market, creating staggered rollouts that leave certain regions waiting longer or paying more for access — a problem we describe when we talk about global rollouts and platform strategies.
  • Delistings and catalogue pruning: A merged owner might remove a title from multiple platforms to negotiate higher fees, causing temporary blackouts.

For example: if a consolidated Banijay-All3 entity chooses to package a hit format with its own distribution arm, smaller broadcasters may be squeezed out of renewal negotiations or face more restrictive streaming windows.

2. Discovery and catalog design: streamlined but homogenized

Scale helps with marketing muscle. Expect larger groups to centralize metadata, promotion budgets and international campaigns. That improves discoverability for major titles across territories and languages, but also means:

  • Algorithms will push the same global hits to viewers worldwide, limiting exposure to niche or local indie shows — discoverability techniques used by video-first sites are relevant reading for teams trying to fight homogenization (How to Run an SEO Audit for Video-First Sites).
  • Catalog curation will favor formats with proven global resale value over experimental local voices.

3. Format licensing and local versions: faster clones, fewer surprises

Formats are TV’s export engine. Shows like MasterChef and The Traitors are valuable because they translate. Consolidation changes format markets in two ways:

  • It standardizes licensing terms and accelerates global rollouts — good for viewers who want immediate access to local versions.
  • It can raise license fees and impose stricter creative controls, squeezing smaller local producers and reducing unique local flavor.

Put simply: you might see more national versions of big formats distributed quickly, but those versions could feel more formulaic because centralized owners enforce brand consistency to protect global resale value. Producers that want to keep local voice often lean on modern studio workflows and distributed production toolkits (Hybrid Studio Workflows, Modern Home Cloud Studio).

Winners and losers: who benefits, who loses out

Consolidation produces clear winners and losers across the TV ecosystem.

Winners

  • Major streaming platforms that can secure global exclusives and avoid costly bidding wars across many small rightsholders.
  • Large broadcasters with bargaining power to get preferred windows or co-production credits.
  • Audiences seeking mainstream hits — those shows will get bigger marketing and faster international distribution.

Losers

  • Independent producers and boutique labels that find it harder to compete on marketing and distribution scale.
  • Smaller local broadcasters and AVOD platforms that can’t afford premium format fees.
  • Viewers craving editorial diversity, niche local storytelling and experimental formats.

Geopolitical and cultural impacts: soft power, localization and content sovereignty

TV production consolidation has geopolitical implications. Large producers act as cultural gatekeepers: which stories travel, which languages gain traction, and which local industries flourish. In 2026, governments are increasingly attentive to cultural exports and content quotas. Consolidation can help countries scale export-ready shows, but it can also concentrate control in a handful of global players.

Key risks and dynamics to watch:

  • Content quotas: Regulators in Europe and other markets may tighten rules requiring local investment and local-language quotas to protect national industries — teams tracking policy should consider privacy-first and edge strategies that help local creators scale (Edge for Microbrands).
  • Soft power: Consolidated formats can amplify national soft power when local versions export local talent and stories globally — but only if creative control remains decentralized. New live and avatar-driven ops are an interesting lens on how distributed creative identities travel (Avatar Live Ops).
  • Data control: Merged entities collecting viewing and audience data across territories wield gatekeeper power over what gets greenlit. Watch research into live-sentiment and audience streams for how this data is used (Trend Report: Live Sentiment Streams).

What this means for fans of MasterChef, The Traitors and other format hits

If you follow format shows, expect two immediate trends in 2026:

  1. Faster international production cycles for proven formats — more localized versions launched within months, not years.
  2. More uniformity across local adaptations as IP owners enforce brand standards and centralize format bibles (format bibles and centralized production tooling).

That can be good news if you like consistent production values and quick access to new national versions. It’s less good if you enjoy wildly divergent local takes driven by small local producers who twist the format into something new.

Practical, actionable advice: what consumers should do now

Here are concrete steps viewers and subscribers can take to stay ahead of the consolidation-driven changes to content availability:

  • Track where shows live: Use cross-platform search tools and services to set alerts for titles. Apps and websites that index streaming catalogs remain the fastest way to know where a show is available globally.
  • Set watch-priority lists: When a season you love is announced, prioritize watching or buying it promptly. Consolidation can lead to temporary delistings during rights renegotiations.
  • Follow production companies: Subscribe to newsletters or follow producers on social for early renewal and release news — merged groups often announce global strategies to trade press and buyers. See how creator communities and micro-events help build direct-to-fan momentum (Creator-Led Micro-Events).
  • Prefer ownership where it matters: If a show is critical to you, consider purchasing seasons or episodes for permanent ownership rather than rely solely on streaming availability.
  • Support local indie content: Contribute to a diverse ecosystem by subscribing to local channels or using platform features that boost independent creators.
  • Consolidation-savvy subscription strategy: Keep a rolling subscription plan: maintain a slate of services for major must-watch titles and rotate add-ons when new exclusives appear.

Tips for creators and smaller producers (brief, practical)

  • Retain format IP where possible and negotiate clear global and local rights carve-outs.
  • Pre-sell or secure co-production partners before making deals with large groups to diversify risk.
  • Lean into local cultural uniqueness — that remains valuable to platforms hungry for genuine regional voice.

What regulators, platforms and producers should watch in 2026

Policy and industry responses will shape how consolidation affects choice. Key recommendations for each stakeholder:

  • Regulators: Monitor market concentration for anticompetitive outcomes and ensure cultural quotas are enforced to protect local production ecosystems.
  • Platforms: Be transparent about license term lengths and avoid exclusive deals that leave whole regions underserved.
  • Producers: Build flexible format bibles and tiered licensing approaches that unlock revenue while allowing creative local input. Look to modern production toolsets and analytics-driven workflows for ways to balance brand control with local creativity (analytics and simulation approaches).
'Consolidation can fund global hits and improve discoverability, but the real test is whether it preserves creative plurality for local communities.'

Future scenarios: three plausible 2026–2028 paths

Which path we take depends on regulation, platform strategy and consumer behavior. Three plausible scenarios:

1. Platform dominance

Large consolidated producers strike exclusive global deals with a handful of dominant streamers. Consumers see rapid global launches of mega-formats but face higher subscription costs and less regional variety.

2. Hybrid balance

Consolidation continues but platforms and regulators negotiate tough transparency and local-investment terms. Result: mainstream hits are widely available, and a protected space remains for independent local creators.

3. Fragmented pushback

Regulators block or limit vertical consolidation. Independent producers, niche platforms and public broadcasters regain ground. Catalogs remain diverse, but global rollouts slow and marketing budgets tighten.

What to watch next: signs that consolidation is reshaping your feed

  • Greater frequency of territory-specific release dates and platform exclusives on major format launches.
  • Announcements of centralized format bibles and stricter brand rules for local versions.
  • Negotiation disputes leading to temporary delistings of established shows.
  • Regulatory moves: antitrust reviews, new quota rules or cultural funding tied to content distribution.

Conclusion: a mixed future for viewers and creators

The Banijay–All3 talks are a signal, not the endgame. Consolidation will bring efficiencies and faster global access for mainstream hits, but it also concentrates decision-making power that can squeeze out smaller voices. For viewers, the practical response is to track, prioritize and sometimes buy; for creators and policymakers, the task is to preserve diversity while capturing scale's advantages.

Actionable next steps

If you want to stay ahead of the changes:

  1. Subscribe to a cross-platform tracking service and set alerts for your favorite formats.
  2. Follow key production groups and industry newsletters for early intel on rights moves.
  3. Support local indie content to keep markets diverse and resilient.

Stay informed. Your streaming feed will change in step with industry M&A — but knowing how to respond keeps your must-watch list intact.

Call to action

Want timely alerts on how consolidation affects the shows you care about? Sign up for our international TV and streaming alerts, and get a weekly briefing on production deals, format licensing changes and what they mean for your streaming catalog.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#Entertainment Business#TV Industry#Global Media
n

newsdesk24

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-01-24T04:48:28.939Z